HRSA HWSM FY2025 · 2023 → 2038

By 2035, the US faces a shortfall of at least 52,430 physician FTEs in metro areas alone.

This is HRSA's own status-quo projection — the number rarely quoted in headlines. Layer on clinical need, staffing realities, and AI-driven demand growth and the gap widens substantially.

The gap is much larger than the headline

2035 physician shortfall by scenario

HRSA Status Quo

52,430

HRSA's published 2025 projection: demand extrapolates observed utilization. 2035 demand = 983,500, supply = 931,070.

HRSA Improved Access

176,540

HRSA's own Combination scenario — what demand would be if everyone had metro, insured, non-Hispanic-white utilization rates.

Our Full Extension (E1+S1+S3)

Live

352,720

All our current L2 extensions at literature defaults: need-based demand (E1), AI productivity (S1), mandatory staffing ratios (S3). Live from the scenario engine.

Why HRSA's headline understates the gap

01

Demand ≠ need

HRSA defines demand as 'services that will be utilized given patient health-seeking behavior, and ability and willingness to pay'. Their own technical documentation states 'demand is different from need.'

02

Scenario space is too narrow

Zero HRSA scenarios model AI productivity, scope-of-practice shifts, mandatory staffing ratios, team-based care, or telehealth capacity effects. We add 14 extension knobs.

03

Financial impact is missing

HRSA publishes FTE counts, not dollars or health outcomes. Our Layer 3 translates shortages into revenue loss, preventable admissions, and GDP drag.

Explore the platform

Three interactive layers. Partners usually start with the Scenario Builder to stress-test assumptions, then jump to Financial Impact for the dollar translation.